Proceedings with Presentations in, pels resource center, pels power Electronics Magazine. After Theresa may formally triggered Article 50, the government brought forward its. Great Repeal Bill White paper (entitled Legislating for the United Kingdoms withdrawal from the european Union) the draft legislation through which the uk will untangle itself from eu law. Making a statement to the house as the White paper was unveiled, Brexit Secretary, david davis, said that the Great Repeal Bill will provide the clarity that business seek and will ensure that, as the uk exits, the same standards and rules that the. David also said that the bill will provide parliament with the oversight it has calling for for some time, as it will be given the chance to adapt and amend the final legislation. Davis was clear that it was not enough to simply repeal eu legislation out of uk law and that it was important to copy across existing European legislation onto uk statue books.
Summary, paper, essay research, paper, summary
Since 1991, and recently every second year the ieee power essay Electronics Society (pels) has organized a technical long-range planning meeting titled Future of Electronic Power Processing and Conversion (feppcon). The feppcon ix was held through 12 close to the beautiful Kruger National Park in south Africa. The overall goal of the meeting was to discuss challenges, opportunities, and research directions beyond restorative 2025 for power electronics and systems technology. The meeting was held in the same location as the original feppcon in 1991, where Prof. Daan van wyk, honorary chair of feppcon ix, gathered specialists in the field from across the globe to discuss in a secluded environment what was needed to make power electronics technology more useful for modern society. In the intervening 25 years, power electronics technology has advanced significantly. Today, power electronics dominates in renewable power generation, industrialization, and appliances. It is also thriving in electrical transportation, including the surrounding infrastructure. The theme of feppcon ix was Technological Opportunities and Obstacles for Applications of Power Electronics in Generation, Storage, transmission, distribution, and Efficient Consumption of Electric Energy. Feppcon series of workshops have a long-term tradition of discussing the future of power conversion technologies and applications. Recently it has been used as a strategic planning workshop for the power Electronics Society every 2nd year.
Cornell University, employment disability Institute. The Arc/ucp disability policy collaboration, dredf, easter seals. (South Hampton roads-VA) endependence center of Northern Virginia, inc. Epilepsy foundation Lawyers' committee for civil Rights Under Law leadership Conference on civil Rights (lccr) Legal Aid Society - employment Center Legal Momentum Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (madef) National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium National Association of Protection and Advocacy systems (napas). Aapd, the largest cross-disability membership organization in the. S., works in collaboration with other plan disability and civil rights organizations on policies that impact people with disabilities. Aapd is also a member of the leadership Conference on civil Rights Executive committee. Future of Electronic Power Processing and Conversion (feppcon-ix) Proceedings and Summary White paper are now available on the.
In fact, organizations and advocates are encouraged to get involved in the work of coalitions representing the interests of the disability community as well as the broader civil summary rights communities. Information is available on opportunities for use by people who may wish to join the coalitions, sign up for their legs listservs, or learn of other ways to work with these groups on common agendas. The notes from each of the discussion groups, a list of participating organizations, and a list of resources will be made available on the aapd and ncd websites: www. Org and /newsroom/advisory/cultural/m, organizations participating in the forum: American Association of people with Disabilities (aapd). Aarp, ada watch/National coalition for Disability rights. American foundation for the Blind (AFB). Afl-cio, american council of the Blind, bazelon Center for Mental health Law. Capital Area adapt, citizens' commission on civil Rights, cochran Firm. Conference of Educational Administrators of Schools and Programs for the deaf (ceasd).
3) Workplace reform, such as demonstrating support of the existing laws; encouraging government to award points to contract bidders with evidence of progressive workplace strategies; and developing Section 508 guidance for the private-sector; 4) Attitudinal reform through media campaigns and rewarding companies for best practices. Educational Excellence equity: The workgroup identified the, no Child Left Behind Act (nclb) as a top priority for collaboration between civil rights and disability rights communities. Together, the participants agreed upon the importance of advocating for the proper enforcement of nclb and to do so immediately through sign-on letters. They also identified a need to publish a compilation of case studies that demonstrate the positive impact of nclb as advocates fight to enhance the benefits of the legislation for diverse groups like students of color, students with disabilities and others. What Happens Next and How to get Involved. Hopefully, the forum highlighted the intersection of topics and issues that affect and that are important to both the disability rights and civil rights communities, and the priorities can be the impetus for future collaborative efforts hosted by a number of the forum participants. Forum planners and participants also hope that various entities will cultivate stronger partnerships through civil rights and disability rights coalitions so that all constituencies can be better served.
Summary paper examples Professional Writing
(University of Illinois at Chicago darrell Simmons,. (University of Texas,. Anderson Cancer Center and Elaine Mbionwu, cchp (National re-entry resource training Center, Atlanta, georgia). Working Lunch: This session featured. Theda zawaiza, chief of Staff for Congressman Major Owens (New York's Eleventh District) who expressed an appreciation for the work being done at the forum. In addition to acknowledging potential for historical contributions through an endeavor like the forum, she fielded questions about legislative activities on Capitol Hill.
Zawaiza also spoke favorably about the possible impact of assembled advocates and their organizations coming together as a unified voice to protect the rights of all Americans. Group Reports: Representatives for each breakout group reported key issues that emerged from the small group sessions. A number of important areas for future collaboration were identified as public policy priorities. Civil Rights Restoration: The workgroup sought to address the erosion of disability and civil rights legislation in federal courts, as well as the erosion of the passion, understanding and support of civil rights in our society. Toward that end, participants identified ways/methods to address the erosion of disability and civil rights legislation in federal courts; acknowledge, expose and address the concerted, well-funded efforts to roll back civil rights; build an understanding and support of civil rights beyond the civil rights and. Diversity-Friendly workplace: This workgroup identified four main priority areas, addressing each through strategic action plans that focused on policy recommendations, advocacy efforts, and litigation. 1) healthcare reform, including support of the healthy families Act, and advocating for a minimum of seven sick days to care for oneself or one's family members; 2) Education/training reform, including enforcement of existing laws.
Subsequent to the november meeting, the three areas to be explored during a one-day public policy forum were narrowed and aligned with forum workgroups as follows: Educational Excellence and Equity, creating and Rewarding diversity-Friendly workplaces, and Restoring civil Rights Legislation. One-day policy forum, a specific goal of the forum was to encourage greater collaboration and communication among disability advocates and the broader civil rights coalition on the priority issues that would surface during the forum. An underlying supposition was that by working together, disability advocates and civil rights leaders and advocates can achieve greater results than through strictly separate efforts on behalf of their constituencies. Briefly, the structure of the day followed that of a morning plenary session, breakout group sessions, a working lunch, return to groups, and afternoon reporting out of priorities to the full body of participants. Morning Plenary session: Welcome and opening remarks were given by Andrew Imparato, president and ceo of aapd and Milton Aponte,.
D., ncd council member and liaison to cdac who spoke on behalf of Lex Frieden, ncd's Chairperson. A highlight of the morning session was the address by wade henderson, Executive director of lccr. In his remarks,. Henderson commended the participants for recognizing that "Disability rights issues are civil rights issues, and civil and human rights pertain to us all. If we work together in this modern civil rights movement, we will continue advances in ways that we can look back with pride.". Breakout sessions: Facilitators were Glenn Fujiura,.
Sample summary paper - etois
Preliminary input from cdac was also folded into the overall purpose of the forum and plan focused on creating a meaningful opportunity for policy experts from the disability and broader civil rights communities to share information and public policy priorities, and to determine opportunities for working. In preparation for the forum, a series of teleconferences were conducted with cdac members to obtain grassroots input regarding potential forum topics, participants and agenda. A dialogue opportunity was arranged during the november 30, 2004 ncd quarterly meeting where members were joined by key presentation individuals on lccr task forces who were invited as presenters to share information about the top public policy priorities of lccr and individual civil rights organizations. Among the presenters were karen Narasaki from the national Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium (napalc) and Chairperson, lccr compliance/Enforcement Committee; raul Gonzalez of the national council of la raza and david Goldberg, lccr staff member representing the lccr education task force; and Jocelyn Frye. Dialogue was co-facilitated by cdac members Glenn Fujiura,. And Darrell Simmons,. Resulting from this dialogue opportunity were potential broad topics around education, employment, and civil rights enforcement issues.
The national council on Disability (NCD)1 initiated a collaborative agreement with the American Association of people with Disabilities (aapd)2 to organize a groundbreaking public policy forum. As stated in their cooperative agreement, the entities portend that immediate benefits would include the creation of greater knowledge and understanding of the areas where the disability policy agenda and the broader civil rights agenda are in alignment. On March 29, 2005 generous support from the leadership Conference on civil Rights (lccr) and aarp made possible a one-day public policy forum that brought together advocates and policy experts from the disability and broader civil rights communities across the country. Aarp was the gracious host for the day, offering meeting space, refreshments, and staff support for the forum logistics. More than 90 individuals from 47 civil rights and disability rights organizations attended the forum and participated in one of three working groups focused on selected topics. Preparation for this get event began some seven months earlier in 2004. Forum Planning, bringing disability and broader civil rights representatives together at the national public policy level was an idea planted during a face-to-face visionary session of ncd's Cultural diversity Advisory committee (cdac) in July 2002.
new section in local newspapers. Section v, section v of the 82 page summary paper provides five recommendations for the kind of project development necessary to arrive at the most effective recalibrating Our Moral Compasses (romc) Surveys—which, as previously mentioned, are viewed as a key building block, and a most. Specifically, descriptions are offered for 19 specific organizations which could be key partners in realizing the potential of Recalibrating Our Moral Compasses Surveys-and 43 other organizations are mentioned as key starting points for identifying potential survey respondents. . Also, since a marginalization of the wisdom of religious, spiritual, and moral traditions is seen as a serious blind spot (with implications that are far from being fully appreciated 3 suggestions are detailed for workshops—in local neighborhood learning Centers, during local Community visioning Initiatives)—which could. The 3 suggestions: Spiritual Friendships, Interfaith peace vigils, and Spiritually responsible Investing. . Section v also includes a brief concluding comments section. Concluding comments (in Section V) include: If many people could see and feel the practical value of carrying out similar forms of the four collaborative problem solving and community education initiatives described in this paper, such solution-oriented activity could become a common experience a common. Section i, section i is a 6 page introduction to the four previous sections. Community peacebuilding and Cultural Sustainability (cpcs) Initiative, critical challenge assessments, unprecedented challenges ahead, maximizing citizen participation, accelerating solution-oriented activity, collaborative problem solving, community education, recalibrating our moral compasses surveys, community visioning, neighborhood learning centers, community service, newspapers, education, peacebuilding, culture change, twitter hashtag CPbCSus. Forum summary paper - March 29, 2005 washington,.
Hopefully, the CPbCSus hashtag will also assist with creating a community of people who—like the cpcs initiative founder and Resource coordinator Stefan Pasti—are focusing on minimizing disconnect and supporting maximum clarity on both the nature of the challenges ahead, and what collaborative problem solving and. Key outreach documents include: 1 unprecedented Challenges Ahead-november, 2015 (2 pages; nov., 2015) 2 launching the community peacebuilding and Cultural Sustainability (cpcs) Initiative hashtag cpbCSus) ( 5 page overview of the cpcs initiative ) (Nov., 2015) 3) the new "Preface to the cpcs summary paper" (4 pages;. Section ii, evidence supporting the urgent need to reach positive tipping points on many of these challenges as soon as possible includes: an 11 page arrangement of"d passages in Section ii 72"d passages which are drawn from the following cpcs initiative critical challenge. A 6 point discussion and commentary of the section ii assessment (in Section iii)—which provides evidence for viewing the 2 challenge identified in Section ii (the marginalization of the Treasured wisdom of Religious, Spiritual, and Moral Traditions) as a serious blind spot with implications which. Section iv, resolving the unprecedented challenges identified by the critical challenge assessment in this summary paper will almost certainly require problem solving on a scale most of us have never known before. To help readers appreciate what such problem solving might look like, part a in Section iv provides a 26 point list of criteria—recommendations for collaborative problem solving and community education initiatives which (for example 1) citizens from every variety of circumstances can trust assignment and. Part B (of Section IV) provides descriptions of 4 key collaborative problem solving and community education initiatives, which are an example of a constellation of initiatives that meets the 26 point criteria in Part.
College Essays, college Application Essays - example summary paper
The community peacebuilding and Cultural Sustainability (cpcs) Initiative provides research for critical challenge alerts, and support for collaborative problem solving and community education initiatives which seek to maximize citizen participation, and accelerate solution-oriented activity. The cpcs initiative is now making accessible an 85 page paper which summarizes work by its founder (Stefan Pasti) from 2001 through June, 2015. The paper is titled "Recalibrating Our 'moral Compasses to resolve unprecedented challenges and discover our collective spiritual destiny (June, 2016 version). The summary paper was updated in June, 2016 (minor editing, making links current) and now has a 4 page preface. The summary paper provides evidence which identifies unprecedented challenges ahead, and advocates for collaborative problem solving and community education initiatives on a scale most of us have never write known before. A brief overview of the paper is provided below. most of the outreach related to the cpcs summary paper is being done on the Twitter platform, through tweets to specific organizations and individuals —and by way of creating a CPbCSus hashtag.